Reed V Town Of Gilbert

Supreme court 135 s ct.

Reed v town of gilbert.

155 2015 is a case in which the united states supreme court clarified when municipalities may impose content based restrictions on signage. Reply of petitioners clyde reed et al. Town of gilbert 135 s. The court s majority opinion reaffirmed the vitality of the content discrimination principle as an animating principle of first amendment law.

The case also clarified the level of constitutional scrutiny that should be applied to content based restrictions on speech. Gilbert arizona town has a comprehensive code sign code or code that prohibits the display of outdoor signs without a permit but ex. While all the justices agreed the ordinance was unconstitutional they disagreed. Certiorari to the united states court of appeals for the ninth circuit.

Certiorari to the united states court of appeals for the ninth circuit. 2218 2015 unanimously invalidated an ordinance that treated signs differently based on their content. 2218 2015 united states supreme court case facts key issues and holdings and reasonings online today. Town of gilbert arizona et al.

Town of gilbert arizona et al. Distributed for conference of june 30 2014. Brief of respondents town of gilbert arizona and adam adams in opposition filed. Distributed jun 30 2014.

Distributed for conference of march 21 2014. Argued january 12 2015 decided june 18 2015. In reed v town of gilbert the u s. Written and curated by real attorneys at quimbee.

Town of gilbert 576 u s. The court found that the sign regulations were content based restrictions on free speech and could not survive strict scrutiny.